In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Chinquist

2004 ND 87, 679 N.W.2d 257, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 184, 2004 WL 878011
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedApril 26, 2004
Docket20040100
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2004 ND 87 (In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Chinquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Chinquist, 2004 ND 87, 679 N.W.2d 257, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 184, 2004 WL 878011 (N.D. 2004).

Opinion

SUSPENSION ORDERED

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] On January 15, 2004, the Disciplinary Board notified the Supreme Court under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4 that it was recommending the reciprocal discipline of C. Charles Chinquist, a member of the bar of the State of North Dakota.

[¶ 2] The Record reflects that an Order suspending Chinquist for failure to file or timely file state and federal individual income tax returns for the years 1991 through 2001 was filed by the Minnesota Supreme Court on December 2, 2003, and a certified copy of the Order was received by Disciplinary Counsel for North Dakota on December 11, 2003.

[¶ 3] The Record further reflects that on January 14, 2004, Disciplinary Counsel served Notice pursuant to N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl 4.4(B) on Chinquist, by certified mail, return receipt requested to two separate addresses; two return receipts were filed which indicate Chinquist received Notice.

[¶ 4] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(B) Chinquist was given notice that a certified copy of the Order of suspension filed by the Minnesota Supreme Court was received, and he had 30 days to file any claim that the imposition of the identical discipline in North Dakota would be unwarranted and the reasons for the claim.

[¶ 5] By letter dated February 26, 2004, Chinquist agreed to discipline similar to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Minnesota.

[¶ 6] Under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D), the Disciplinary Board forwarded its recommendation that Chinquist be suspended from the practice of law for 90 days, and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $250. The Court considered the matter, and

[¶ 7] ORDERED, C. Charles Chinquist is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 90 days, effective May 1, 2004.

[¶ 8] FURTHER ORDERED, C. Charles Chinquist pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $250, payable to the Secretary of the Disciplinary Board.

[¶ 9] FURTHER ORDERED, C. Charles Chinquist comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3.

[¶ 10] GERALD W. YANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Irwin v. City of Minot
2015 ND 60 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. Chinquist
2006 ND 107 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2006)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Chinquist
2006 ND 107 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 ND 87, 679 N.W.2d 257, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 184, 2004 WL 878011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-reciprocal-discipline-of-chinquist-nd-2004.