In re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Bristol

448 N.W.2d 71, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 293, 1989 WL 139547
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 22, 1989·No. No. CO-89-1175·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Marie Vristol, Victoria Svetlik, Jane Maurer and Douglas Ekmark for further review be, and the same is, granted and the order of the court of appeals filed September 16, 1989, be, and the same is reversed. In re Volz, 448 N.W.2d 70 (Minn., filed herewith). The matter is accordingly remanded to the court of appeals for consideration and disposition of the appeal on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Bristol, 448 N.W.2d 71, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 293, 1989 WL 139547 (Mich. 1989).

448 N.W.2d 71 (In re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of Bristol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Proposed Termination of Volz
448 N.W.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989)