In re the Probate of Will of Callahan

273 A.D. 884, 77 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5122
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1948·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

We find no convincing showing in petitioner’s [respondent’s] moving papers or in the evidence taken that petitioner was misled into not interposing timely objections to the probate of the will. We might be. persuaded on the Surrogate’s finding, however, to affirm the order vacating the decree of probate and permitting petitioner to interpose objections, were there any satisfactory showing of a substantial basis for contesting the will and reasonable probability of success. There is no such showing in this case which would justify opening the decree admitting the will to probate. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the application denied and the matter remitted to the Surrogate of the county of New York for further action in accordance with this memorandum. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Probate of Will of Callahan, 273 A.D. 884, 77 N.Y.S.2d 348, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 884 (In re the Probate of Will of Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Committee for Weizmann Institute of Science v. Dunn
883 N.E.2d 996 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
In re the Estate of Sandow
25 Misc. 2d 356 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Probate of the Will of Bitterman
203 Misc. 796 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)