In re the Probate of the Will of Wilkens

16 Misc. 2d 641, 167 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1322
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMarch 14, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Misc. 2d 641 (In re the Probate of the Will of Wilkens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Probate of the Will of Wilkens, 16 Misc. 2d 641, 167 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1322 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1950).

Opinion

Anthony P. Savarese, S.

The items upon which the examination is sought are proper and are allowed. The fact that a party to be examined may be incompetent to testify under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act is not a valid ground for refusing to order an examination (Lemlich v. Lemlich, 266 App. Div. 748). There has been a sufficient showing of special circumstances justifying the examination of the witness Keith. The period of examination will commence three years prior to the date of execution of the propounded instrument and terminate one year thereafter. The persons to be examined will produce, if in their possession or control, all papers enumerated in the notice of motion relevant and pertinent to the matters upon which an examination has been allowed.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemlich v. Lemlich
266 A.D. 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Misc. 2d 641, 167 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-wilkens-nysurct-1950.