In re the Probate of the Will of Prochazka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Probate of the Will of Prochazka

271 A.D.2d 1018

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1018 (In re the Probate of the Will of Prochazka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Will of Prochazka, 271 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In a •probate proceeding, application was made for an order transferring all papers and proceedings from the Surrogate’s Court of Putnam County to the Surrogate’s Court of New York County on the ground that the decedent at the time of his death was a resident of the County of New York. Order of the Putnam County Surrogate’s Court, denying motion of appellants, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The determination on the issue of fact presented cannot be said to be against the weight of evidence. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

members of a membership corporation, to enjoin termination of their memberships, and for alleged damages, order denying in part and granting in part appellants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint as insufficient, to direct the separate stating and numbering of alleged causes of action, and to strike out portions of the said complaint, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a •probate proceeding, application was made for an order transferring all papers and proceedings from the Surrogate’s Court of Putnam County to the Surrogate’s Court of New York County on the ground that the decedent at the time of his death was a resident of the County of New York. Order of the Putnam County Surrogate’s Court, denying motion of appellants, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The determination on the issue of fact presented cannot be said to be against the weight of evidence. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

members of a membership corporation, to enjoin termination of their memberships, and for alleged damages, order denying in part and granting in part appellants’ motions to dismiss the first amended complaint as insufficient, to direct the separate stating and numbering of alleged causes of action, and to strike out portions of the said complaint, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-prochazka-nyappdiv-1947.