In re the Probate of the Will of Lindemann

191 Misc. 285, 80 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3783
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided November 12, 1947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Savarese, S.

Paragraph First” of the propounded instrument directs decedent’s husband, the sole legatee, to pay all her debts and funeral expenses. Paragraph Third ” confers a power of sale upon the husband for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the will. Although he is not expressly appointed executor, the implication is clear that decedent intended him to act in that capacity. Petitioner is accordingly an executor by the tenor of the will. The proof satisfies me that the propounded instrument was duly executed as a will at a time when decedent was competent and free from restraint. Submit decree, accordingly, admitting will to probate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Probate of the Will of Lindemann, 191 Misc. 285, 80 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3783 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1947).

191 Misc. 285 (In re the Probate of the Will of Lindemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Accounting of Brewster
191 Misc. 523 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1948)