In re the Probate of the Will of Levine

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Probate of the Will of Levine

191 Misc. 284, 75 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3469

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 191 Misc. 284 (In re the Probate of the Will of Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Will of Levine, 191 Misc. 284, 75 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3469 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Savarese, S.

Decedent, Roslyn Levine, died October 7, 1947, leaving a paper writing dated June 23, 1947, which has been offered for probate as her last will and testament. No objection is made to its probate. The proofs satisfy me that it was validly executed at a time when decedent was competent and free from restraint. The only question presented is whether the petitioner, Benjamin Siegel, is entitled to letters testamentary. After providing for the payment of certain legacies and debts, the will reads as follows: “ Whatever minor debts may come up I want my uncle Ben Siegel to take care of.”

Does this provision appoint petitioner executor by implication? The will is evidently not lawyer drawn. Nowhere is the term “ executor ” used, nor is anyone designated to take charge of the estate being disposed of except in the above-quoted sentence. The duty to pay debts is one of the primary duties of an executor. The intention to impose this duty justifies the inference that she intended petitioner to act in that capacity generally. The petitioner is an executor according to the tenor of the will. (Baker v. Baker, 18 App. Div. 189; Matter of Hazen, 175 Misc. 851; Matter of Brocato, 143 Misc. 664; Matter of Walsh, 144 N. Y. S. 442.) Submit decree admitting will to probate and directing that letters testamentary issue to petitioner upon qualifying in the manner prescribed by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savarese, S.

Decedent, Roslyn Levine, died October 7, 1947, leaving a paper writing dated June 23, 1947, which has been offered for probate as her last will and testament. No objection is made to its probate. The proofs satisfy me that it was validly executed at a time when decedent was competent and free from restraint. The only question presented is whether the petitioner, Benjamin Siegel, is entitled to letters testamentary. After providing for the payment of certain legacies and debts, the will reads as follows: “ Whatever minor debts may come up I want my uncle Ben Siegel to take care of.”

Does this provision appoint petitioner executor by implication? The will is evidently not lawyer drawn. Nowhere is the term “ executor ” used, nor is anyone designated to take charge of the estate being disposed of except in the above-quoted sentence. The duty to pay debts is one of the primary duties of an executor. The intention to impose this duty justifies the inference that she intended petitioner to act in that capacity generally. The petitioner is an executor according to the tenor of the will. (Baker v. Baker, 18 App. Div. 189; Matter of Hazen, 175 Misc. 851; Matter of Brocato, 143 Misc. 664; Matter of Walsh, 144 N. Y. S. 442.) Submit decree admitting will to probate and directing that letters testamentary issue to petitioner upon qualifying in the manner prescribed by law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Misc. 284, 75 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-levine-nysurct-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack