In re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins
110 A.D. 907, 96 N.Y.S. 941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 A.D. 57 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1905·Published
Opinions
Hirschberg, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward and Jenks, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., read for reversal.
Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county directing the deposit of moneys or a warrant or attachment to issue against Fanny W. Hopkins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins, 110 A.D. 907, 96 N.Y.S. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
110 A.D. 907 (In re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins
65 N.E. 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Buell v. . Van Camp
23 N.E. 538 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Roderigas v. . East River Savings Institution
76 N.Y. 316 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Yates v. . North
44 N.Y. 271 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)
Steuben County Bank v. . Alberger
78 N.Y. 252 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
In Re the Probate of the Will of Budlong
3 N.E. 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
In re Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Codicil of Ruppaner
7 A.D. 11 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Rolker v. Gonzalez
25 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Crandall v. Bryan
5 Abb. Pr. 162 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Whitlock v. Roth
10 Barb. 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
People v. Snaith
10 N.Y.S. 589 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Abrams v. Lavine
35 N.Y.S. 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Acker, Merrall & Condit v. Saynisch
25 Misc. 415 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1898)