In Re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins

68 N.E. 1118, 176 N.Y. 595, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 921
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 1903·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parker, Ch. J.

The motion for reargument must be denied, without costs, on the ground that the question presented is no longer open for discussion in this court. In reported and unreported cases we have often decided — too often to now discuss the question — that since the enactment of the statute, now to be found in section 2588 of the Code, an appellate court must “ make an order directing the trial by a jury of the material questions of fact arising upon the issues between the parties ” where the reversal or modification of a decree by the appellate court is founded upon a question of fact, and that the appellate court may do it in any other case where, in its opinion, it would seem that the ends of justice might be best promoted by such a course.

O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins, 68 N.E. 1118, 176 N.Y. 595, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 921 (N.Y. 1903).

68 N.E. 1118 (In Re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Accounting of Sherman
125 N.E. 546 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of Richardson
137 A.D. 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
In re the Probate of the Will of Hopkins
95 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)