In re the Probate of the Will of Harper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Probate of the Will of Harper

18 A.D.2d 985, 238 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 985 (In re the Probate of the Will of Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Will of Harper, 18 A.D.2d 985, 238 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree, denying probate, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to all parties filing briefs payable out of the estate, and a new trial directed on the issue of testamentary capacity. The learned Surrogate properly directed a verdict on framed issues one, two and three which involved the validity of the execution of the will; issue five which pertained to undue influence; and issue six which pertained to fraud. The fourth issue of testamentary capacity was submitted to the jury. The question of testamentary capacity was presented fairly to the jury in a charge to which there were no objections or requests and one exception not here involved. However, evidence was introduced by the contestant relevant only on the question of undue influence which may well have influenced the jury on the issue of testamentary capacity. The issue was close and it may have been decided on evidence unrelated to the issue of testamentary capacity. A new trial confined to the issue of testamentary capacity is accordingly directed in the interests of justice. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 309; Matter of Weston, 15 A D 2d 410, 412.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree, denying probate, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to all parties filing briefs payable out of the estate, and a new trial directed on the issue of testamentary capacity. The learned Surrogate properly directed a verdict on framed issues one, two and three which involved the validity of the execution of the will; issue five which pertained to undue influence; and issue six which pertained to fraud. The fourth issue of testamentary capacity was submitted to the jury. The question of testamentary capacity was presented fairly to the jury in a charge to which there were no objections or requests and one exception not here involved. However, evidence was introduced by the contestant relevant only on the question of undue influence which may well have influenced the jury on the issue of testamentary capacity. The issue was close and it may have been decided on evidence unrelated to the issue of testamentary capacity. A new trial confined to the issue of testamentary capacity is accordingly directed in the interests of justice. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 309; Matter of Weston, 15 A D 2d 410, 412.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Yalente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 985, 238 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-harper-nyappdiv-1963.