In Re the Probate of the Will of Dix
192 N.E.2d 270, 13 N.Y.2d 846, 242 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1075
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate. The jury verdict of fraud and undue influence reversed by the Appellate *848 Division as against the weight of the evidence leaves snch issues as much open in a new litigation as they would have been on a new trial had one been necessary here. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Probate of the Will of Dix, 192 N.E.2d 270, 13 N.Y.2d 846, 242 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1075 (N.Y. 1963).
192 N.E.2d 270 (In Re the Probate of the Will of Dix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City & County of Denver v. District Court Ex Rel. City & County of Denver
939 P.2d 1353 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1997)
In re the Estate of Evanchuck
145 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Estate of Matteo
134 A.D.2d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)