In Re the Probate of the Will of Cashman
21 N.E.2d 193, 280 N.Y. 681, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1489
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. L, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Probate of the Will of Cashman, 21 N.E.2d 193, 280 N.Y. 681, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1489 (N.Y. 1939).
21 N.E.2d 193 (In Re the Probate of the Will of Cashman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mayorga v. Tate
302 A.D.2d 11 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Thomas E. Brei
311 F.2d 463 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Brei
311 F.2d 463 (Second Circuit, 1962)
In re the Probate of the Will of Coddington
120 N.E.2d 777 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
In re the Probate of Will of Cleveland
273 A.D. 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Stiles v. Clifton Springs Sanitarium Co.
74 F. Supp. 907 (W.D. New York, 1947)