In re the Probate of the Will of Blood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Probate of the Will of Blood

277 A.D.2d 1048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1048 (In re the Probate of the Will of Blood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Will of Blood, 277 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by contestant from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, admitting to probate two codicils to a will, which was admitted to probate by a separate, decree, the contest as to the will having been withdrawn. After trial, the Surrogate directed the jury to answer in the affirmative questions as to the due execution and publication of the codicils and the testamentary capacity of the deceased, and to answer in the negative questions as to whether the codicils were procured by fraud or undue influence. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs [1049]*1049to respondent, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P.- J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 577.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by contestant from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, admitting to probate two codicils to a will, which was admitted to probate by a separate, decree, the contest as to the will having been withdrawn. After trial, the Surrogate directed the jury to answer in the affirmative questions as to the due execution and publication of the codicils and the testamentary capacity of the deceased, and to answer in the negative questions as to whether the codicils were procured by fraud or undue influence. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs [1049]*1049to respondent, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P.- J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 577.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-blood-nyappdiv-1950.