In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as Walsh's Will

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as Walsh's Will

1 Tuck. Surr. 132

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tuck. Surr. 132 (In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as Walsh's Will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as Walsh's Will, 1 Tuck. Surr. 132 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

The Surrogate.

This paper propounded as a will of real his estate is subscribed by the testator, “ Edward X Walsh.” mark.

It was witnessed by Thomas Duane and George Saul. Duane is produced before the Surrogate, and testifies to the execution. Saul is dead, and his death and handwriting are proven. Ho other persons were present at the execution. ■ A mark is a sufficient subscription to a will. It is not necessary that the testator subscribe his name in writing. Any thing that he has adopted as a subscription of his name fulfils the requirement of the statute,.if subscriptum (written under) by his own hand. In the will of McCoy, I admitted a subscription utterly [133]*133unintelligible, which was proven by the subscribing witnesses (both living at the time of probate), and by others present at the execution, to have been made by the testator with chalk or lead. In the will of Van Hanswyck (44 Barbour, 494), the Supreme Court sustained my decision that a mark made by the testator, while another person assisted in guiding his hand, was a subscription. But the making of a mark has its inconveniences, as the present case demonstrates. A will subscribed by a mark, instead of by handwriting, cannot be proven at all if one of the witnesses cannot be produced. The statute provides that where one or more or all the subscribing witnesses are dead, out of the State, or'insane, proof must be taken of the handwriting of the testator, and of the, absent witness xor witnesses, on propounding the will for probate. As no proof of the testator’s handwriting can be given in the case where his subscription is not made in handwriting, the petition for probate must be denied. It is a case not provided for by statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Surrogate.

This paper propounded as a will of real his estate is subscribed by the testator, “ Edward X Walsh.” mark.

It was witnessed by Thomas Duane and George Saul. Duane is produced before the Surrogate, and testifies to the execution. Saul is dead, and his death and handwriting are proven. Ho other persons were present at the execution. ■ A mark is a sufficient subscription to a will. It is not necessary that the testator subscribe his name in writing. Any thing that he has adopted as a subscription of his name fulfils the requirement of the statute,.if subscriptum (written under) by his own hand. In the will of McCoy, I admitted a subscription utterly [133]*133unintelligible, which was proven by the subscribing witnesses (both living at the time of probate), and by others present at the execution, to have been made by the testator with chalk or lead. In the will of Van Hanswyck (44 Barbour, 494), the Supreme Court sustained my decision that a mark made by the testator, while another person assisted in guiding his hand, was a subscription. But the making of a mark has its inconveniences, as the present case demonstrates. A will subscribed by a mark, instead of by handwriting, cannot be proven at all if one of the witnesses cannot be produced. The statute provides that where one or more or all the subscribing witnesses are dead, out of the State, or'insane, proof must be taken of the handwriting of the testator, and of the, absent witness xor witnesses, on propounding the will for probate. As no proof of the testator’s handwriting can be given in the case where his subscription is not made in handwriting, the petition for probate must be denied. It is a case not provided for by statute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tuck. Surr. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-paper-propounded-as-walshs-will-nysurct-1870.