In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as the Will of Dieterich

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as the Will of Dieterich

1 Tuck. Surr. 129

DecidedJuly 1, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tuck. Surr. 129 (In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as the Will of Dieterich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as the Will of Dieterich, 1 Tuck. Surr. 129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

The Surrogate.

A party to a special proceeding in a Surrogate’s Court may be examined as witness in his own behalf, in the same manner as any other witness.

A party to an “ action,” brought under the Code, cannot be examined under certain circumstances. But this is not an “ action.” (See § 399 of Code of Procedure.)

But, supposing, as has been argued, that this “ proceeding ” is to be governed by the same rule as applies to “ actions,” still the offer of Mrs. Dieterich as a witness does not come within the disqualifying conditions- of the Code.

The transactions or communications she may have had with her deceased husband, could not be given in evidence by her against parties who are the executors, administrators, heirs-at-law, next of kin, or assignees of the deceased. The proponent does not stand in any such position. He is not yet an executor; he may never be. He is simply the person nominated as an executor in the paper propounded. He will be the executor if the will goes to probate, and if he qualifies, and if letters issue to him; not before.

The only heir and next of kin of decedent is the [130]*130daughter, a minor, for whom the widow is the general ' guardian, and who opposes the probate.

Upon all grounds, 1 consider the testimony admissible, 1 and shall admit it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Surrogate.

A party to a special proceeding in a Surrogate’s Court may be examined as witness in his own behalf, in the same manner as any other witness.

A party to an “ action,” brought under the Code, cannot be examined under certain circumstances. But this is not an “ action.” (See § 399 of Code of Procedure.)

But, supposing, as has been argued, that this “ proceeding ” is to be governed by the same rule as applies to “ actions,” still the offer of Mrs. Dieterich as a witness does not come within the disqualifying conditions- of the Code.

The transactions or communications she may have had with her deceased husband, could not be given in evidence by her against parties who are the executors, administrators, heirs-at-law, next of kin, or assignees of the deceased. The proponent does not stand in any such position. He is not yet an executor; he may never be. He is simply the person nominated as an executor in the paper propounded. He will be the executor if the will goes to probate, and if he qualifies, and if letters issue to him; not before.

The only heir and next of kin of decedent is the [130]*130daughter, a minor, for whom the widow is the general ' guardian, and who opposes the probate.

Upon all grounds, 1 consider the testimony admissible, 1 and shall admit it.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Tuck. Surr. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-paper-propounded-as-the-will-of-dieterich-nysurct-1870.