In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Krowl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Krowl

243 A.D. 628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 628 (In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Krowl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Krowl, 243 A.D. 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county denying probate to a written instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of William J. Krowl, deceased, affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. We are of the opinion that the finding [629]*629of the jury that the testator lacked mental capacity to make a will is supported by the evidence. Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county denying probate to a written instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of William J. Krowl, deceased, affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. We are of the opinion that the finding [629]*629of the jury that the testator lacked mental capacity to make a will is supported by the evidence. Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Tompkins, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-last-will-testament-of-krowl-nyappdiv-1935.