In re the probate of the last will & testament of Johnson

85 A. 254, 80 N.J. Eq. 525, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 349
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 18, 1912·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the prerogative court will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion delivered in the orphans court. The respondent’s costs in this court shall be paid by the appellants.

No. 78—

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vredeneurgh, Congdon, Treaoy—12.

For reversal—None.

No. 79—

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenghard, Bergen, Voori-iebs, Minturn, Kaltsch, Bogert, Vredeneurgh, Congdon, Treaoy—12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the probate of the last will & testament of Johnson, 85 A. 254, 80 N.J. Eq. 525, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 349 (N.J. 1912).

85 A. 254 (In re the probate of the last will & testament of Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Phillips
84 N.W.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1957)
In Re Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna Filo
75 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re the Estate of Neuman
32 A.2d 826 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
In Re Raynolds
27 A.2d 226 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
In Re Halton
161 A. 809 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1932)
Cole v. Webb
295 S.W. 1035 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)