In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Barmeier

248 A.D. 636
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, brought to revoke letters testamentary, decree modified by striking therefrom the first ordering paragraph, marked (a), and as so modified unanimously affirmed, with costs, payable out of the estate, to all parties appearing and filing briefs, except appellant Reese. In our opinion, the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county had jurisdiction to grant' letters testamentary upon this estate. Its decree, granting such letters, was, therefore, not void, although the appointment of the respondent Brooklyn Trust Company was mistakenly made. At most, the decree was merely voidable and such letters might, in the discretion of the Surrogate’s Court, be revoked upon the application of a party aggrieved. We are of the opinion, however, that such discretion should not be exercised in favor of the appellant Reese, since he is not a party interested in the estate, nor a creditor thereof, nor is he aggrieved, because he will be amply protected by any judgment entered in the action in the Canadian court. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ. [156 Misc. 657.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Barmeier, 248 A.D. 636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 636 (In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Barmeier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Davis
309 S.W.2d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1957)
In Re Dugan
309 S.W.2d 137 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1957)
Estate of Bily
215 P.2d 78 (California Court of Appeal, 1950)