In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Aebly
This text of 261 A.D. 839 (In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Aebly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond County in so far as it denies the petition of Charles S. Scholen for letters of administration c. t. a. and grants limited letters of administration to Waldo M. Chapin. Decree, in so far as appealed from, reversed on law and facts, with costs, payable out of the estate, and the application of Charles S. Scholen for letters of administration c. i. a. granted. The credible evidence in respect of the stock certificate claimed to be possessed by Scholen as collateral for a loan does not warrant a finding that Scholen is dishonest and therefore disqualified under section 94, Surrogate’s Court Act, to serve as administrator. The wishes of Astrid Carlson that Scholen should act as administrator should be heeded under the circumstances herein. Whether or not the stock in question should be deemed an asset of the estate may be determined when an accounting is had, in accordance with the procedure in an analogous situation in Matter of Rosenfeld (157 Misc. 686). Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 839, 25 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-last-will-testament-of-aebly-nyappdiv-1941.