In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Tobin
This text of 168 A. 464 (In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The executors of the will of Amelia Graig Tobin appeal from a decree of the prerogative court awarding a fee of $5,000 to counsel for the contestants. This was a reduction of $2,500 from the award in the orphans court. The sole question before us is the reasonableness of the contest. The two grounds of contest were undue influence and incapacity. The testatrix had independent advice. There is not a suggestion in the record that the beneficiaries exerted the slightest influence over any of her acts. In fact, the contestants5 proofs demonstrate nothing except that there were frequent quarrels and bickerings between testatrix and the principal objects of her bounty. Everything proved indicated that testatrix disposed of her estate, as she had long planned, to the objects of her affections.
As to mental incapacity, the evidence indicates more than usual mental alertness. Since there was no reasonable basis for the contest, there was no basis for the allowance.
The decree will be reversed.
For r, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 3.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 11.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A. 464, 114 N.J. Eq. 170, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-alleged-will-of-tobin-nj-1933.