In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Braunstein

171 A. 788, 115 N.J. Eq. 556, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 772

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The appellant makes four points on appeal, namely, (1) the act does not apply to the facts in the instant case; (2) the amount of the allowance is unreasonable and excessive; (3) a fair reading of the statute does not justify an order in advance; (4) the grand-daughter is not within the provisions of the statute; of which the first, in so far as it was presented below, is within the sixth reason mentioned in the opinion of the vice-ordinary; the second is the fourth reason below; the third is embraced within the second reason below and the fourth is the third reason below.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-ordinary on the points mentioned.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchaed, Pabkek, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskikk, Kays, Hetfield, Dbae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.