In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Braunstein
This text of 171 A. 788 (In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Braunstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant makes four points on appeal, namely, (1) the act does not apply to the facts in the instant case; (2) the amount of the allowance is unreasonable and excessive; (3) a fair reading of the statute does not justify an order in advance; (4) the grand-daughter is not within the provisions of the statute; of which the first, in so far as it was presented below, is within the sixth reason mentioned in the opinion of the vice-ordinary; the second is the fourth reason below; the third is embraced within the second reason below and the fourth is the third reason below.
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-ordinary on the points mentioned.
*558 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tkenchaed, Pabkek, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskikk, Kays, Hetfield, Dbae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A. 788, 115 N.J. Eq. 556, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-probate-of-the-alleged-will-of-braunstein-nj-1934.