In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of Greene

186 A.D. 903, 172 N.Y.S. 894, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The decedent was domiciled in the county of Bronx. After the death of his wife he went to Monroe county on a visit, but without any intent to make Monroe county his permanent home. He was not, therefore, a resident of Monroe county within the meaning of that word as used in section 2515 of the Code of Civil Procedure. He never became a resident of Westchester county because, no matter what his intent might have been, he never actually went there to five. His residence, as this term is used in section 2515 of the Code, being synonymous with the word domicile, still remained in the county of Bronx, the Surrogate’s Court of which county alone had jurisdiction to take proof [904]*904on the probate of the will. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to that court, with direction to dismiss the same for want of jurisdiction. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of Greene, 186 A.D. 903, 172 N.Y.S. 894, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

186 A.D. 903 (In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of Greene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.
568 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (C.D. California, 2008)
In re the Estate of Fischer
30 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)
In re the Estate of Kassebohm
15 Misc. 2d 52 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Probate of the Will of Lamoutte
195 Misc. 907 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)