In re: the Petition of Law Students
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
IN RE: THE PETITION OF LAW : No. 74 WM 2020 STUDENTS FOR EQUITABLE : RESPONSES TO COVID-19 BY RYAN : Petition for Review Under the ALOYSIUS SMITH AND PRETTY : Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction and for MARTINEZ, TRUSTEES AD LITEM; : Extraordinary Relief under the ROBERT SUITE, MARY BETH KUZNIK, : Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction BRANDON VANTINE, ROBERT GAVIN, : CHRISTIAN WOLGEMUTH, JESSICA : MCDERMOTT, RAVEN MOORE, DEREK : DEMERI, CATHERINE CUFF, MICHELLE : TABACH, KARLA PISARCIK, CAROLINE : ROBELEN, KARLI STUDY :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2020, Petitioners’ Application for Leave to
File Reply Brief is GRANTED, and their Petition for Review under the Court’s Exclusive
Jurisdiction and for Extraordinary Relief under the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction is
DENIED. Respondent’s Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is
DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: the Petition of Law Students (In re: the Petition of Law Students) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.