In Re the Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Field

506 N.W.2d 631, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 739, 1993 WL 435864
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 25, 1993
DocketC5-93-981
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 506 N.W.2d 631 (In Re the Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Field, 506 N.W.2d 631, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 739, 1993 WL 435864 (Mich. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition with this Court alleging that the respondent Joseph A. Field had committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline by failing to maintain and by falsely certifying on his 1990,1991, and 1992 attorney registration statements that he did maintain the requisite trust account books and records; by commingling client and personal funds in his trust accounts and by otherwise mishandling the trust accounts; and by misappropriating earnest money held in connection with three separate real estate transactions.

After the petition had been filed, respondent entered into a stipulation for discipline with the Director. Pursuant to the stipulation, the Director withdrew the Sixth Count of the petition in which violation of Rule 1.8(a), Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, was alleged; respondent waived all of his procedural rights to hearings as provided in Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility; and respondent withdrew the answer he had filed herein and unconditionally admitted the remaining allegations of the petition. In the stipulation, the parties noted that respondent has no disciplinary history, has made restitution of all but $365 of the misappropriated funds, and has been candid and cooperative in the disciplinary investigation. The parties joined in recommending that appropriate discipline pursuant to Rule 15, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, is a 1-year suspension and respondent further agreed to the imposition and payment of $750 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

The Court, having considered all of the facts and circumstances surrounding this matter, the petition of the Director, and the stipulation of the parties, NOW ORDERS:

1. That the respondent, Joseph A. Field, hereby is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota for a minimum period of 1 year commencing with the date of this order, pursuant to Rule 15, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

2. That respondent may file a petition for reinstatement 90 days before the expiration of the 1-year minimum suspension period; provided however, that respondent shall not be reinstated until the following conditions have been met:

a. Respondent has completed the 1-year minimum period of suspension ordered herein;

b. Respondent has demonstrated that he is fit to practice law and that his past misconduct is not likely to recur;

e. Respondent is current in his continuing legal education requirements;

d. Respondent has successfully completed the professional responsibility examination;

e. Respondent has complied with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility; and

f. Respondent has paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay the Lawyers Pro *632 fessional Responsibility Board $750 pursuant to Rule 24(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

3. That, if and when this court reinstates respondent, the court shall place respondent on supervised public probation for a period of 2 yeárs, pursuant to conditions to be determined by the court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne

M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez
812 N.W.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2012)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau
787 N.W.2d 168 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2010)
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney
709 N.W.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)
In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Field
571 N.W.2d 577 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1997)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Montpetit
528 N.W.2d 243 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 N.W.2d 631, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 739, 1993 WL 435864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-field-minn-1993.