In re the Overton
This text of 226 A.D. 684 (In re the Overton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion to punish appellant denied, without costs. Appellant committed no contempt of the decree of October 23, 1923. The mandate alleged to have been disobeyed by appellant was not directed to him. The decree provided “ that the proceeds of said sale be paid by the purchaser to the Brooklyn Trust Company, Bedford Branch, to the credit of said administrator and administratrix, subject to the further order of this court.” The proceeds of the sale were not paid to appellant. He was not present when they were paid. He was not guilty of any willful misconduct in connection with the matter. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-overton-nyappdiv-1929.