In re the Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Ohio Supreme Court

In re the Office of Disciplinary Counsel

785 N.E.2d 480, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1499

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 2003

Docket2003-0016

StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 480 (In re the Office of Disciplinary Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 785 N.E.2d 480, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1499 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for consideration upon the filing of a petition of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for disclosure of evidence presented to the Seneca County Grand Jury in 2001. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the petition be, and hereby is, denied. It is further ordered that this matter be dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifee and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for consideration upon the filing of a petition of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for disclosure of evidence presented to the Seneca County Grand Jury in 2001. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the petition be, and hereby is, denied. It is further ordered that this matter be dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifee and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 N.E.2d 480, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-office-of-disciplinary-counsel-ohio-2003.