In re the McM. Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the McM. Children

234 A.D.2d 5, 650 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12269

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D.2d 5 (In re the McM. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the McM. Children, 234 A.D.2d 5, 650 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered April 13, 1995, placing the five subject children with the Commissioner of Social Services for 12 months, following a fact-finding determination that respondent had neglected the children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that respondent, presently incarcerated for sexual and physical abuse of the children, had abandoned the children under Social Services Law § 384-b (5) by failing to write to them for over a year although able to do so, and thereby had neglected them under Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (ii) (see, Matter of Shaniqua L., 193 AD2d 370). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered April 13, 1995, placing the five subject children with the Commissioner of Social Services for 12 months, following a fact-finding determination that respondent had neglected the children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that respondent, presently incarcerated for sexual and physical abuse of the children, had abandoned the children under Social Services Law § 384-b (5) by failing to write to them for over a year although able to do so, and thereby had neglected them under Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (ii) (see, Matter of Shaniqua L., 193 AD2d 370). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 5, 650 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-mcm-children-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack