In re the Mayor & Common Council of City of Brooklyn

3 How. Pr. 26
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 26 (In re the Mayor & Common Council of City of Brooklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Mayor & Common Council of City of Brooklyn, 3 How. Pr. 26 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

The objection is clearly fatal. The decision of two commissioners, where all are present and acting, is the decision of all; but two cannot do any vahd act in the absence of the other. The motion to confirm is denied bn the ground that no final report has been made by the commissioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 How. Pr. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-mayor-common-council-of-city-of-brooklyn-nysupct-1847.