In Re the Marriage of Welker

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re the Marriage of Welker

179 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 13, 2005

DocketED 85384

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 S.W.3d 410 (In Re the Marriage of Welker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Marriage of Welker, 179 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vicky Welker (Vicky) appeals the Circuit Court’s Amended Judgment Dissolving Marriage, which dissolved her marriage to Ricky Welker (Ricky). Vicky contends the Court erred when it 1) calculated the amount of child support; 2) dissolved the marriage on the basis that it was irretrievably broken; and 3) awarded Ricky primary custody of the children. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vicky Welker (Vicky) appeals the Circuit Court’s Amended Judgment Dissolving Marriage, which dissolved her marriage to Ricky Welker (Ricky). Vicky contends the Court erred when it 1) calculated the amount of child support; 2) dissolved the marriage on the basis that it was irretrievably broken; and 3) awarded Ricky primary custody of the children. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.W.3d 410, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-welker-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack