In Re the Marriage of Walsh

614 P.2d 913, 44 Colo. App. 502, 1980 Colo. App. LEXIS 657
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 17, 1980
Docket80CA0209
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 614 P.2d 913 (In Re the Marriage of Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Marriage of Walsh, 614 P.2d 913, 44 Colo. App. 502, 1980 Colo. App. LEXIS 657 (Colo. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

COYTE, Judge.

Wife appeals from a judgment abating accrued child support. We modify and, as modified, affirm.

The parties stipulated in their dissolution proceeding that husband would pay $150 per month child support. Husband became delinquent and was badly injured in a fire on October 25, 1979. On November 14, 1979, he filed a motion to abate child support payments. On January 3, 1980, at a hearing on the delinquencies and abatement, the parties stipulated as to the delinquencies and payment thereon. The court ordered that child support payments which had accrued since October 25, 1979, would be abated until husband was able to return to his employment.

*914 Relying on Engleman v. Engleman, 145 Colo. 299, 358 P.2d 864 (1961), wife asserts that the court cannot abate child support payments which accrued prior to the date of the hearing on the abatement motion. We disagree.

Section 14-10-122(1), C.R.S.1973, states that a provision of a decree respecting support “may be modified only as to installments accruing subsequent to the motion for modification . . . .” Under this statute, the court may now modify support payments back to the date of the filing of the motion, rather than only from the date of the hearing on the motion as was the case under Engleman, supra, decided under the earlier statute.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court abating child support payments back to October 25, 1979, is modified to the extent that the abatement shall begin as of the date the husband filed his motion, November 14, 1979. Thus, child support is abated from November 14, 1979, until husband is able to return to work.

Husband’s motion for damages and attorneys’ fees is denied.

The judgment of the trial court, as modified, is affirmed.

VAN CISE and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Marriage of Nelson
2012 COA 205 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2012)
In Re the Marriage of Greenblatt
789 P.2d 489 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1990)
In Re the Marriage of Van Inwegen
757 P.2d 1118 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1988)
In Re Davidson
72 B.R. 384 (D. Colorado, 1987)
In Re the Marriage of Hauger
679 P.2d 604 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1984)
In Re the Marriage of Klein
671 P.2d 1345 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1983)
In Re the Marriage of Robinson
651 P.2d 454 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1982)
In Re the Marriage of Serfoss
642 P.2d 44 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 P.2d 913, 44 Colo. App. 502, 1980 Colo. App. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-walsh-coloctapp-1980.