In re the Marriage of Valley

781 P.2d 1219, 99 Or. App. 252
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 8, 1989
DocketCC82-314; CA A49529
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 781 P.2d 1219 (In re the Marriage of Valley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Marriage of Valley, 781 P.2d 1219, 99 Or. App. 252 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

BUTTLER, P. J.

Husband seeks reconsideration of our opinion in this case, 97 Or App 95, 775 P2d 332 (1989), where we held that wife is entitled to 47 percent of husband’s Coast Guard pension. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, allow reconsideration and modify the disposition in our former opinion to read:

“Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment modifying dissolution judgment to award wife 47 percent of husband’s Coast Guard pension beginning with benefits payable on or after February 8, 1988, and entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order pursuant to IRC § 414(p). Costs to wife.”

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; adhered to as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Marriage of Stokes
228 P.3d 701 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Porter v. Porter
1996 SD 6 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
In re the Marriage of Schoning
807 P.2d 820 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Clifton v. Clifton
1990 OK 88 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 P.2d 1219, 99 Or. App. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-valley-orctapp-1989.