In re the Marriage of Valley
781 P.2d 1219, 99 Or. App. 252
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 8, 1989·No. CC82-314; CA A49529·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Husband seeks reconsideration of our opinion in this case, 97 Or App 95, 775 P2d 332 (1989), where we held that wife is entitled to 47 percent of husband’s Coast Guard pension. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, allow reconsideration and modify the disposition in our former opinion to read:
“Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment modifying dissolution judgment to award wife 47 percent of husband’s Coast Guard pension beginning with benefits payable on or after February 8, 1988, and entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order pursuant to IRC § 414(p). Costs to wife.”
Petition for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Valley, 781 P.2d 1219, 99 Or. App. 252 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
781 P.2d 1219 (In re the Marriage of Valley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Marriage of Stokes
228 P.3d 701 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Porter v. Porter
1996 SD 6 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
In re the Marriage of Schoning
807 P.2d 820 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Clifton v. Clifton
1990 OK 88 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)