In re the Marriage of Snead

448 N.W.2d 705, 1989 Iowa App. LEXIS 317, 1989 WL 147822
CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedOctober 5, 1989
DocketNo. 89-12
StatusPublished

This text of 448 N.W.2d 705 (In re the Marriage of Snead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Marriage of Snead, 448 N.W.2d 705, 1989 Iowa App. LEXIS 317, 1989 WL 147822 (iowactapp 1989).

Opinion

HAYDEN, Justice.

In this appeal Henry challenges the alimony, child support, property division, and attorney fees awarded to Mary. He also seeks a small change in the Christmas visitation schedule and contests the requirement he is required to pay all of the travel costs connected with the visitation. He also requests he be allowed to claim the children as dependents and deductions upon his income tax returns. Mary requests attorney fees on appeal. We affirm as modified.

The parties were married in Georgia on December 27, 1980. This is Henry’s first marriage and Mary’s second. Her first husband died. She has custody of one child born of her first marriage. This child, a girl, was thirteen years old at the time of trial. Henry and Mary have twins, a boy and a girl, born December 19, 1984. The twins were placed in joint legal custody of both parties. Mary was awarded their physical care.

Mary lives in Georgia and Henry lives in Iowa. Henry was granted visitation of the children one week near Christmas and six weeks in the summer, to be exercised in Iowa. In addition, he was granted visitation one weekend each month to be exercised in Georgia. The trial court required Henry be responsible for all costs of travel associated with visitation.

At the time the parties were married, Henry was a senior in medical school. [707]*707Mary worked as a medical technician for doctors in Augusta and Atlanta, Georgia, until May 1983. After Henry completed his residency in June 1984, they moved to Grinnell, Iowa. Henry engaged in the practice of internal medicine at Grinnell General Hospital. In 1984, Henry earned $61,840. Henry’s net income on his income tax returns for the following years is shown as follows: 1985 — $161,676; 1986— $170,844; 1987 — $190,199. Henry paid Mary a salary through his professional corporation for the years 1985 through 1987 as follows: 1985 — $15,000; 1986 — $13,500; 1987 — $9,000. Henry testified as of 1987 he was no longer associated with the Grin-nell Hospital. He bought in with a Des Moines professional group and earns $70,-000 per year. The trial court observed Henry would soon be eligible for profit-sharing with the Des Moines Medical Group, P.C., and his income there will increase. Mary indicated at trial with her present training she would not be able to earn more than $12,000 per year. She has been primarily a homemaker in recent years.

The trial court directed Henry to pay Mary child support of $750 per month for each of the parties’ two children. This amount is to continue until the children attain age twenty-two if they are full time students engaged in post-high school educational activities. Mary’s exhibit number four shows her monthly expenses for herself and the twins are $2,644.

Henry was also ordered to pay Mary alimony of $1,000 per month for five years and $500 per month thereafter until her death or remarriage.

The trial court found, and the record supports, the parties had the following assets and liabilities of corresponding values:

ASSETS
Item Value
Furniture $ 6,000.00
Appliances 1,000.00
Oriental Rug 1,000.00
Pictures 2,500.00
China & Silver 2,640.00
1987 Honda Civic 11,000.00
1984 Honda Civic 2,500.00
Respondent’s Pension 31,187.00
Respondent’s Profit Sharing 21,083.00
Petitioner’s IRA 6,000.00
Respondent’s IRA 6,000.00
Other personal property in possession of Respondent 4,993.00
Respondent’s Checking Account 420.00
Total Assets 96,323.00
LIABILITIES
Medical College of Georgia $15,000.00
Master Card 5,512.00
Wacobia Bank 750.00
Brenton Bank Management Fee 1,500.00
Total Liabilities 22,760.00
Net Worth $73,463.00

In addition to the above, Mary owned 9.75 acres of land in Georgia. This is a nonmarital asset as Mary acquired it upon the death of her first husband. Henry listed a debt of $15,000. This debt was for the purchase price of his interest in the Des Moines Medical Group, P.C. The trial court did not include this as a liability of the parties. The judge reasoned, if Henry paid this amount for that interest, then an asset in like amount would be created in his name.

The trial court awarded Mary (petitioner) the following property:

[708]*708Item Value
Furniture $ 6,000.00
Appliances 1,000.00
Oriental Rug 1,000.00
Pictures 2,500.00
China & Silverware 2,640.00
1987 Honda Civic 11,000.00
Petitioner’s IRA 6,000.00
Total Assets to Petitioner 30,140.00
Plus cash to be paid by Respondent 6,641.00
Total Assets to Petitioner $36,781.00

The trial court awarded Henry (respondent) the following property and debts:

Item Value
1984 Honda Civic $ 2,500.00
Respondent’s pension 31,187.00
Respondent’s profit-sharing 21,083.00
Respondent’s IRA 6,000.00
Personal property in hands of Respondent 4,993.00
Respondent’s checking account 420.00
Total Assets to Respondent $66,183.00
Less total debt to be paid by Respondent 22,760.00
Total Assets to
Less cash to be paid to Petitioner 6,641.00
Total net assets to Respondent $36,782.00

Henry was permitted to pay Mary’s cash settlement in payments of $1,328 on January 1 of each year until paid in full. The unpaid balance is to draw interest at the rate of ten percent per annum.

Henry was ordered to pay $3,000 to Mary’s trial attorney and the court costs.

Our review is de novo. Iowa R.App.P. 4. We give weight to the fact findings of the trial court, especially when considering the credibility of witnesses. Iowa R.App.P. 14(f)(7). After careful consideration, we make the following modifications.

The twins’ birthday is on December 19th. The trial court ordered Christmas visitation of one week to commence on the 26th of December each year in the event the parties were unable to agree on the dates of the one week Christmas visitation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 N.W.2d 705, 1989 Iowa App. LEXIS 317, 1989 WL 147822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-snead-iowactapp-1989.