In re the Marriage of Ridge
This text of 159 P.3d 1292 (In re the Marriage of Ridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wife, who prevailed as appellant, see Gano-Ridge and Ridge, 211 Or App 393, 155 P3d 84 (2007), petitions for reconsideration, pointing out a mathematical error in our opinion. Wife notes that, at 211 Or App at 411 n 9, we stated the total assets awarded to wife as $334,495, which included the trial court’s previous equalizing judgment of $90,495. We then included the amount of the former equalizing judgment again in the equalizing judgment of $311,520, thereby overstating by $90,495 the net property award to wife ($646,015), 211 Or App at 411, when the correct calculation of the property awarded to wife is $555,520. Wife asks the court to increase the equalizing judgment to $402,015 so that the net award to wife is $646,015. As we explained in our opinion, a just and proper award to wife requires an equalizing judgment to wife of $311,520. We accordingly correct the calculation at 211 Or App at 411 n 9 as follows:
$244,000
$311,520
$555,520
total assets awarded to wife equalizingjudgment
We similarly correct the amount stated as the net property award to wife at 211 Or App at 411 as $555,520.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 P.3d 1292, 213 Or. App. 235, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-ridge-orctapp-2007.