In re the Marriage of Portello

660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 475, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2769
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 6, 1983·No. 12151; CA A25121·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The notice of appeal in this domestic relations case was filed more than thirty days after the trial court’s order, albeit less than thirty days after the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration of a trial court’s final order does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. ORS 19.026. See Credit Bureau v. Marshall, 53 Or App 46, 49, 630 P2d 910, rev den 291 Or 514 (1981).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Portello, 660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 475, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2769 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

660 P.2d 1098 (In re the Marriage of Portello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidling v. Dove
670 P.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)