In re the Marriage of Portello

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage of Portello

660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 475, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2769

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 6, 1983

Docket12151; CA A25121

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 660 P.2d 1098 (In re the Marriage of Portello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Marriage of Portello, 660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 475, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2769 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The notice of appeal in this domestic relations case was filed more than thirty days after the trial court’s order, albeit less than thirty days after the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration of a trial court’s final order does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. ORS 19.026. See Credit Bureau v. Marshall, 53 Or App 46, 49, 630 P2d 910, rev den 291 Or 514 (1981).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The notice of appeal in this domestic relations case was filed more than thirty days after the trial court’s order, albeit less than thirty days after the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration of a trial court’s final order does not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. ORS 19.026. See Credit Bureau v. Marshall, 53 Or App 46, 49, 630 P2d 910, rev den 291 Or 514 (1981).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 475, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-portello-orctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack