In re the Marriage of Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage of Miller

3 P.3d 715, 167 Or. App. 253, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 732

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 10, 2000

Docket97C-34405; CA A106112

StatusPublished

This text of 3 P.3d 715 (In re the Marriage of Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Marriage of Miller, 3 P.3d 715, 167 Or. App. 253, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 732 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from the judgment in this case dissolving a marriage that, including pre-marital cohabitation, lasted 17 years. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to award him any spousal support. Husband is presently unemployable as the result of a number of medical conditions. Although wife is employed full-time, her salary simply covers living expenses for herself and the parties’ children and a small contribution to a retirement account. The parties have few other assets.

Both parties, thus, have limited financial resources. However, on de novo review, we conclude that husband is entitled to some spousal support because of the length of the marriage and his current absolute unemployability. Given wife’s current circumstances and the assets of the parties, we set that support at $100 per month.

Remanded with instructions to modify judgment to provide for spousal support of $100 per month to husband, beginning with entry of appellate judgment; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from the judgment in this case dissolving a marriage that, including pre-marital cohabitation, lasted 17 years. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to award him any spousal support. Husband is presently unemployable as the result of a number of medical conditions. Although wife is employed full-time, her salary simply covers living expenses for herself and the parties’ children and a small contribution to a retirement account. The parties have few other assets.

Both parties, thus, have limited financial resources. However, on de novo review, we conclude that husband is entitled to some spousal support because of the length of the marriage and his current absolute unemployability. Given wife’s current circumstances and the assets of the parties, we set that support at $100 per month.

Remanded with instructions to modify judgment to provide for spousal support of $100 per month to husband, beginning with entry of appellate judgment; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 P.3d 715, 167 Or. App. 253, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-miller-orctapp-2000.