In re the Marriage of McQueen
566 P.2d 208, 30 Or. App. 165, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1522
Opinion
In this proceeding, dissolving a marriage of a little over two years’ duration, wife contends that the trial court improperly divided the marital assets. Considering the ages of the parties, their opportunities for employment, the duration of the marriage, and the nature and source of the assets, we agree with the division made by the trial court.
Affirmed. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of McQueen, 566 P.2d 208, 30 Or. App. 165, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1522 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
566 P.2d 208 (In re the Marriage of McQueen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Marriage of Frank
740 P.2d 240 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
In re the Marriage of Danielson
607 P.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Flowers
577 P.2d 1369 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of York
569 P.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Pozzi
566 P.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)