In re the Marriage of Mason

89 P.3d 1215, 193 Or. App. 300, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 525
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 28, 2004·No. 94C-30176; A120804·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from a judgment that terminated his spousal support obligation based on a substantial change of circumstances and that also required him to pay a retroactive child support obligation of $6,300. The trial court imposed the retroactive support obligation sua sponte without wife requesting such relief by way of any appropriate motion or pleading. We agree with husband that, in the circumstances presented here, the court’s sua sponte imposition of the retroactive support obligation was erroneous. See Richards and Richards, 95 Or App 281, 284, 768 P2d 927 (1989) (in the absence of a motion to modify, a retroactive support obligation could not be imposed on a prior custodial parent following a change of physical custody).

Imposition of child support arrearage obligation of $6,300 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Mason, 89 P.3d 1215, 193 Or. App. 300, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 525 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

89 P.3d 1215 (In re the Marriage of Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kim and Kinnersley
337 Or. App. 503 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2025)