In re the Marriage of Lee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage of Lee

713 P.2d 43, 77 Or. App. 312, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2338

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 22, 1986

Docket77-41 E; CA A34358

StatusPublished

This text of 713 P.2d 43 (In re the Marriage of Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Marriage of Lee, 713 P.2d 43, 77 Or. App. 312, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2338 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this modification of a dissolution decree, father appeals from the support order of $200 per month for each of the parties’ two minor children, Samuel and Erin. We agree with father that the support award was based in part on consideration of factors other than mother’s need for support for the children.

Because Samuel is with father almost all the time, we eliminate the provision for support for Samuel. However, Erin is with mother half the time during the school year and all the time during the summer. Mother has need of financial assistance to provide adequately for Erin. Father’s support obligation for Erin is reduced to $100 per month for September through May and shall remain at $200 per month for Erin from June through August.

Judgment modified to eliminate the provision requiring father to pay mother for support of Samuel and to reduce father’s support obligation for Erin to $100 monthly from September through May; affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this modification of a dissolution decree, father appeals from the support order of $200 per month for each of the parties’ two minor children, Samuel and Erin. We agree with father that the support award was based in part on consideration of factors other than mother’s need for support for the children.

Because Samuel is with father almost all the time, we eliminate the provision for support for Samuel. However, Erin is with mother half the time during the school year and all the time during the summer. Mother has need of financial assistance to provide adequately for Erin. Father’s support obligation for Erin is reduced to $100 per month for September through May and shall remain at $200 per month for Erin from June through August.

Judgment modified to eliminate the provision requiring father to pay mother for support of Samuel and to reduce father’s support obligation for Erin to $100 monthly from September through May; affirmed as modified. No costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 P.2d 43, 77 Or. App. 312, 1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 2338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-lee-orctapp-1986.