In re the Marriage of Jacobson

742 P.2d 691, 87 Or. App. 434
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 16, 1987·No. 87047; CA A36935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Father petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case. See Jacobson and Jacobson, 84 Or App 704, 735 P2d 627 (1987). We grant reconsideration solely to consider a trial court exhibit (Exhibit U) which we did not consider before because we found that it was not part of the record on appeal. See 84 Or App at 707 n 2. Father’s motion to supplement the record to include Exhibit U had been allowed; however, the exhibit had not been transmitted to us by the trial court. It has now been transmitted.

We have reexamined the record, including Exhibit U, and adhere to our original decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Jacobson, 742 P.2d 691, 87 Or. App. 434 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

742 P.2d 691 (In re the Marriage of Jacobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Korteweg v. Shroyer
870 P.2d 863 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)