In Re the Marriage of Hurta

605 P.2d 1278, 25 Wash. App. 95, 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2842
CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedDecember 31, 1979
Docket6962-4-I
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 605 P.2d 1278 (In Re the Marriage of Hurta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Marriage of Hurta, 605 P.2d 1278, 25 Wash. App. 95, 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2842 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

*96 Williams, J.

Jenny Sue Rosenberg, nee Hurta appeals from an order which modified a decree of dissolution changing her daughter's last name from Rosenberg to Hurta. We reverse.

In the decree of dissolution, provision was made for the unborn child of the parties, but no name was given. When the child was born, the mother gave her name as Jesse Jo Rosenberg for purposes of registration. RCW 70.58.070. See Doe v. Dunning, 87 Wn.2d 50, 549 P.2d 1 (1976). Subsequently, the father, Michael Robert Hurta, filed a petition for modification of the decree to show the child's name as Jesse Jo Hurta.

There is no provision in the dissolution statutes RCW 26.09.010 et seq. for change of a child's name; application must be made under RCW 4.24.130, which provides:

Any person desiring a change of his name or that of his child or ward, may apply therefor to the superior court of the county in which he resides, by petition setting forth the reasons for such change; thereupon such court in its discretion may order a change of the name and thenceforth the new name shall be in place of the former.

But even if the application for the name change had been properly made, the court would have had to deny the petition because there is nothing in the record to show that the proposal was considered from the standpoint of the child, and it is the child's best interests which control. Laks v. Laks, 25 Ariz. App. 58, 540 P.2d 1277 (1975).

The order changing the name of Jesse Jo Rosenberg is vacated.

Callow, C.J., and Ringold, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Marriage of Killman
955 P.2d 1228 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1998)
In Re the Marriage of Killman
939 P.2d 970 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1997)
Mayor v. Mayor
554 A.2d 1109 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1989)
Rio v. Rio
132 Misc. 2d 316 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
Daves v. Nastos
711 P.2d 314 (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)
Daves v. Nastos
694 P.2d 686 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1985)
Marriage of Jacobs v. Jacobs
309 N.W.2d 303 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 P.2d 1278, 25 Wash. App. 95, 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-hurta-washctapp-1979.