In re the Marriage of Hardwick
565 P.2d 405, 29 Or. App. 857, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2458
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 13, 1977·No. No. 74-2364-E-2, CA 7391·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The wife appeals the dissolution of marriage decree, contending as a matter of law that it was error for the trial court to consider property owned by the wife in making a division of property. ORS 107.105(1)(e) provides:
"For the division or other disposition between the parties of the real or personal property, or both, of either or both of the parties as may be just and proper in all the circumstances.”
The statute does not violate Art XV, § 5, Oregon Constitution,1 which permits a married woman to own property free and clear of the husband’s liabilities.
Affirmed. Costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Hardwick, 565 P.2d 405, 29 Or. App. 857, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2458 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
565 P.2d 405 (In re the Marriage of Hardwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Marriage of Sherman
590 P.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)