In re the Marriage of Gibbons

964 P.2d 1050, 155 Or. App. 262, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1253
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 15, 1998·No. 95-DR-0852; CA A98405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM

Appellant moves for reconsideration of our decision dismissing the appeal. Gibbons and Gibbons, 153 Or App 377, 956 P2d 1069 (1998). Appellant contends that our decision is incorrect. He advances no arguments in support of that contention that were not already raised in his memorandum in opposition to the motion to dismiss and addressed in our opinion. See ORAP 6.25(1)(v) (“Claims addressing legal issues already argued by the parties’ briefs and addressed by the Court of Appeals are disfavored.”).

Motion for reconsideration denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Gibbons, 964 P.2d 1050, 155 Or. App. 262, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1253 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

964 P.2d 1050 (In re the Marriage of Gibbons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.
7 P.3d 577 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)