In re the Marriage of Ernst

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re the Marriage of Ernst

888 S.W.2d 765, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1944, 1994 WL 705398

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 65098·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-Husband appeals the trial court’s pendente lite order directing him to pay Respondent-Wife $1,838.00 per month temporary maintenance, $10,000 for attorney fees on account, and $10,000 for costs on account. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Wife’s motion to dismiss appeal for violation of Rule 84.04 denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-Husband appeals the trial court’s pendente lite order directing him to pay Respondent-Wife $1,838.00 per month temporary maintenance, $10,000 for attorney fees on account, and $10,000 for costs on account. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Wife’s motion to dismiss appeal for violation of Rule 84.04 denied as moot.

In re the Marriage of Ernst, 888 S.W.2d 765, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1944, 1994 WL 705398 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

888 S.W.2d 765 (In re the Marriage of Ernst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.