In re the Marriage of Condon
690 P.2d 1121, 70 Or. App. 725, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4600
Opinion
The trial court’s holding that defendant was in indirect contempt is not supported by adequate findings. See State ex rel v. Bassett, 166 Or 628, 113 P2d 432, 114 P2d 546 (1941); State ex rel Hiers v. Strain, 56 Or App 402, 642 P2d 315 (1982).
Reversed. Costs to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Condon, 690 P.2d 1121, 70 Or. App. 725, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4600 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
690 P.2d 1121 (In re the Marriage of Condon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Bassett v. Bassett
114 P.2d 546 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
State ex rel. Hiers v. Strain
642 P.2d 315 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)