In re the Marriage of Bohn
609 P.2d 390, 45 Or. App. 623, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Marriage of Bohn. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Or. App. 561 →
Opinion
In our decision in this case we held that joint custody of the parties’ child as specified in the decree was not in the best interest of the child and modified the decree by awarding permanent custody to the father. Bohn and Bohn, 43 Or App 561, 603 P2d 781 (1979). The Supreme Court allowed the petition for review and stated:
«* * *xhe Court of Appeals, after finding that joint custody was unsatisfactory, should have remanded the proceeding to the trial court for further testimony.” 288 Or 697, 699, 607 P2d 1375 (1980).
The case is remanded to the trial court for further evidence on the issue of the permanent custody of the child.
Remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Bohn, 609 P.2d 390, 45 Or. App. 623, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2394 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
609 P.2d 390 (In re the Marriage of Bohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bohn v. Bohn
607 P.2d 1375 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1980)
In re the Marriage of Bohn
603 P.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)