In re the Marriage of Bettiol

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage of Bettiol

762 P.2d 1066, 93 Or. App. 548

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 26, 1988

Docket151,459; CA A46076

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 762 P.2d 1066 (In re the Marriage of Bettiol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Marriage of Bettiol, 762 P.2d 1066, 93 Or. App. 548 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

WARREN, J.

Husband has moved for reconsideration of our opinion, 92 Or App 587, 759 P2d 322 (1988), in which we terminated his spousal support obligation but did not eliminate the trial court’s award of attorney fees to wife as the prevailing party. Our failure to do so was inadvertant. We grant the motion, adhere to our decision to eliminate spousal support and delete the award of attorney fees.

On reconsideration, judgment further modified to vacate the trial court’s award of attorney fees; decision otherwise adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARREN, J.

Husband has moved for reconsideration of our opinion, 92 Or App 587, 759 P2d 322 (1988), in which we terminated his spousal support obligation but did not eliminate the trial court’s award of attorney fees to wife as the prevailing party. Our failure to do so was inadvertant. We grant the motion, adhere to our decision to eliminate spousal support and delete the award of attorney fees.

On reconsideration, judgment further modified to vacate the trial court’s award of attorney fees; decision otherwise adhered to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 P.2d 1066, 93 Or. App. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-bettiol-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack