In re the Marriage of Belt
680 P.2d 390, 68 Or. App. 42, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3237
Opinion
On our own motion, we amplify the dispositional language in our original opinion, 65 Or App 606, 672 P2d 1205 (1983), insofar as it relates to wife’s cross-appeal only, to read as follows:
“On wife’s cross-appeal, decree is modified to allow wife costs and such sum as the trial court determines to be reasonable on account of attorney fees incurred by her at the trial level without limiting the award to additional fees incurred as a result of husband’s conduct before or during trial. The case is remanded for determination of those amounts.”
In all other respects, our original opinion stands as written.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Belt, 680 P.2d 390, 68 Or. App. 42, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3237 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
680 P.2d 390 (In re the Marriage of Belt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Marriage of Triperinas
59 P.3d 586 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
In the Matter of Marriage of Tofte and Tofte
895 P.2d 1387 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
Morgan v. Morgan
795 P.2d 684 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1990)
In re the Marriage of Bernier
745 P.2d 1231 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
In re the Marriage of Saucy
733 P.2d 939 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
Matter of Marriage of Olinger and Olinger
707 P.2d 64 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
In re the Marriage of Cunningham
702 P.2d 1157 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)