In re the Marriage Easterla

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage Easterla

613 P.2d 1100, 47 Or. App. 253, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3055

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 21, 1980

DocketNo. 15-79-03478, CA 16720

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 613 P.2d 1100 (In re the Marriage Easterla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Marriage Easterla, 613 P.2d 1100, 47 Or. App. 253, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3055 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

JOSEPH, P.J.

In this dissolution case the only issue was the division of marital property. The value of assets awarded husband was substantially larger than of those awarded wife; to correct the disparity wife was given a judgment against husband. In this appeal husband challenges the amount of that judgment, as well as the interest factor. The decree is affirmed in those respects.

However, the court ordered that the judgment also be against husband’s corporations. The corporations were not parties to this action, and no judgment or decree could be entered against them. Provisions of the decree purporting to affect Easterla Properties, Inc., and Springfield Dairy Queen, Inc., shall be stricken.

Affirmed as modified. Costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOSEPH, P.J.

In this dissolution case the only issue was the division of marital property. The value of assets awarded husband was substantially larger than of those awarded wife; to correct the disparity wife was given a judgment against husband. In this appeal husband challenges the amount of that judgment, as well as the interest factor. The decree is affirmed in those respects.

However, the court ordered that the judgment also be against husband’s corporations. The corporations were not parties to this action, and no judgment or decree could be entered against them. Provisions of the decree purporting to affect Easterla Properties, Inc., and Springfield Dairy Queen, Inc., shall be stricken.

Affirmed as modified. Costs to appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 P.2d 1100, 47 Or. App. 253, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-easterla-orctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack