In re the Liquidation of Summit Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Liquidation of Summit Insurance

91 A.D.2d 958, 458 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 958 (In re the Liquidation of Summit Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Liquidation of Summit Insurance, 91 A.D.2d 958, 458 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Price, J.), entered October 14,1981, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the damage award for pain and suffering to the sum of $4,000, and, except as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Claimant was injured while riding his motorcycle when he was struck by a hit-and-run driver. Claimant was insured by Summit Insurance Company of New York. Pursuant to the uninsured motorist indorsement contained in his policy he made demand for arbitration. While the proceedings were pending Summit was taken over by the Superintendent of Insurance, initially for rehabilitation and then for liquidation. Hearings were held before a referee who ruled that the accident was due to the negligence of the hit-and-run driver without any fault on the part of the claimant. However, he awarded him damages for lost earnings and medical expenses only. He .refused to make any award for pain and suffering. The superintendent moved to confirm the report of the referee while claimant cross-moved to vacate it. Special Term was of the opinion that it was error to deny claimant any award for pain and suffering. Accordingly, it modified the report to award claimant $600 for pain and suffering. Although the injuries suffered were not of a permanent nature, they included, among other things, the fracture of a finger and a dislocation of the knee which entailed a hospital stay of some seven or eight hours. In these circumstances, we think Special Term was rather niggardly in its award for pain and suffering. Accordingly, we modify to increase that award to the sum of $4,000. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Bloom, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Price, J.), entered October 14,1981, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to increase the damage award for pain and suffering to the sum of $4,000, and, except as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Claimant was injured while riding his motorcycle when he was struck by a hit-and-run driver. Claimant was insured by Summit Insurance Company of New York. Pursuant to the uninsured motorist indorsement contained in his policy he made demand for arbitration. While the proceedings were pending Summit was taken over by the Superintendent of Insurance, initially for rehabilitation and then for liquidation. Hearings were held before a referee who ruled that the accident was due to the negligence of the hit-and-run driver without any fault on the part of the claimant. However, he awarded him damages for lost earnings and medical expenses only. He .refused to make any award for pain and suffering. The superintendent moved to confirm the report of the referee while claimant cross-moved to vacate it. Special Term was of the opinion that it was error to deny claimant any award for pain and suffering. Accordingly, it modified the report to award claimant $600 for pain and suffering. Although the injuries suffered were not of a permanent nature, they included, among other things, the fracture of a finger and a dislocation of the knee which entailed a hospital stay of some seven or eight hours. In these circumstances, we think Special Term was rather niggardly in its award for pain and suffering. Accordingly, we modify to increase that award to the sum of $4,000. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Bloom, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 958, 458 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-liquidation-of-summit-insurance-nyappdiv-1983.