In Re the Last Will & Testament of McDonald
This text of 163 S.E. 700 (In Re the Last Will & Testament of McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon inspection of the record we find that none of the assignments of error constitutes sufficient cause for disturbing the judgment. Neither of them calls for particular comment. The question put to the juror was the repetition of one he had previously answered; the judgment roll was competent as tending to show the feeling existing between the testator and the caveators; and' except as provided in Rule 3, Superior Court, the judge’s decision in reference to the right to open and conclude the argument is final and not reviewable. Rule 6; In re Brown’s Will, 194 N. C., 583.
•No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 S.E. 700, 202 N.C. 842, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-last-will-testament-of-mcdonald-nc-1932.