In Re the Last Will & Testament of McDonald

163 S.E. 700, 202 N.C. 842, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 267

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Upon inspection of the record we find that none of the assignments of error constitutes sufficient cause for disturbing the judgment. Neither of them calls for particular comment. The question put to the juror was the repetition of one he had previously answered; the judgment roll was competent as tending to show the feeling existing between the testator and the caveators; and' except as provided in Rule 3, Superior Court, the judge’s decision in reference to the right to open and conclude the argument is final and not reviewable. Rule 6; In re Brown’s Will, 194 N. C., 583.

•No error.